Footprint

Heart

Bouncing Ball

Tulip

Leaf

Flag

Fire

Starburst

Ice Cream Cone

Balls

Chili Pepper

3 Leaf Clover

Fishing Fly

Star

Big and Strong

Teensy

Sweet and Cute

Falling

Neon

Joyous

Fancy and Elegant

Clever and Tasty

Cats

Dogs

Corporate Stylin'

Corporate Stylin'

One or More?

One or More?

Pancake House

ornia

Perfect Usage

Poor Usage

Only Had One

Farmers', Farmer's, or Farmers?

With or Without?

With or Without?

Go Giants!

Go Giants!


For a very complete explanation of the apostrophe see the Wikipedia article.
Even the Supreme Court is divided on the proper usage of the apostrophe:

As one of its final acts last term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued Kansas v. Marsh, a case involving the constitutionality of a state death-penalty statute. The 5-4 decision exposed the deep divide that exists among the nation’s intellectual elite regarding one of society’s most troubling issues — namely, whether the possessive form of a singular noun ending with the letter s requires an additional s after the apostrophe.

The issue reached a crescendo in Marsh primarily because of two circumstances. First, the statute in question originated from a state with a name ending in s. Second, the majority opinion was written by a justice whose last name ends in s. Given the confluence of these factors, it was inevitable that the justices’ philosophical differences on matters of American usage would be thrust into the spotlight.

A BITTER DIVIDE

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court (and joined by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Samuel Alito Jr., Anthony Kennedy, and Antonin Scalia), concluded that the Kansas statute was not unconstitutional. In reaching this conclusion, Thomas repeatedly referred to the relevant law as Kansas’ statute. In response, Justice David Souter wrote a dissent that was joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and John Paul Stevens. The dissent revealed Souter’s bitter disagreement with both the substantive conclusion of the majority and the grammatical philosophy of the opinion’s author.

See the complete scholarly and hilarious article by Jonathan Starble.

And the complete opinions of the court.


For an actual book of this photo essay click here.
Other web resources:

Apostrophe Protection Society

The Apostrophe Vigilante with his Apostrophiser

How To Use An Apostrophe

The Girl's Like Spaghetti: Why, You Can't Manage without Apostrophes!

Fucking Apostrophes